Running the plugins when monitoring can be a great if you run a heavy session with lots of latency. UA have a library of great plugins that you won't be able to run elsewhere. I really liked it in the beginning but I regret that purchase now. I bought the UAD Apollo Twin USB when it was released a few years ago and have used it with several DAWs including Reason. In that instance, both units should perform nearly identical. The Thunderbolt Apollo Twin for Windows may have better performance but I haven’t used that.Īlso, the version of Auto-Tune you mentioned isn’t native to UAD platform so your computer would be running it, not the Apollo. Now this is the Apollo Twin USB I’m talking about. Modern computer chips can handle so much that your won’t have any significant issues with either unless tracking live or needing a large plug in count while tracking. It’s not that big of a deal but when I compared tracking guitar through the UAD and the RME, the RME drivers gave me very near zero latency and that helped with the “feel” Also, there is the slightest latency issue with the USB Apollo Twin. With the 4 chips in the Twin, you simply can’t add many plug ins to handle both channels at once if you choose certain plug ins. The reason is that the best purpose for the UAD interfaces is tracking real time for instruments and vocals. If you would have said the Apollo 4x, I would say the Apollo. That said, if I had to do it again, I would buy the RME over the Apollo Twin. Well, let me say that both interfaces are awesome and sound fantastic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |